Agreement For Agistment

Owners and landowners (landowners) may allow horses or herds belonging to another person to be kept on their land for a fee (agistment). The owner of the horse may also be held responsible for the costs of feeding, exercising, training and maintaining his horse. Administration can encompass a wide range of situations, from simple precautions for the treatment of pet ponies to the professional management of racehorses and livestock. The meeting can be organized by a brief conversation. However, oral agreements rarely provide for problems such as veterinary care or illness, non-payment by owners or the need to relocate animals in an emergency. There is also no record of what was agreed in the event of a dispute. In the event of a dispute, the terms of an oral agreement can be difficult to prove. The landowner claimed a deposit right on cattle under the Storage Deposit Act, which would have allowed the landowner to sell the farm herd and withhold unpaid aid rights on the product. However, the landowner`s appeal failed because the court found that the agreement did not fall within the scope of the Inventory Deposit Act. In addition, the Court found that, in most cases, general law does not imply a guideline on agistment agreements. Land tenure agreements are the first step in ensuring fruitful cooperation between landowners and livestock owners.

Under legislation on the prevention of cruelty to animals, it is the defence of a farmer`s lawsuit to prove that he entered into an agreement with another person at the time of an alleged offence for that person to care for the animal. In the absence of a written agreement covering non-payment of fees, the Impounding of Livestock Act 1994 allows a landowner to pledge an agile horse in the event of late payment and to take steps to sell, sell or destroy the horse in the event of late payment. Many landowners retain these rights in agist contracts and stud farmers often demand the right to sell offspring and update documents such as stud books and race papers. Cassie O`Bryan, of Madgwicks Lawyers, said: “A formal written agreement between the parties is always a good start to any relationship, given that the owner is warned of the consequences of non-payment and both parties agree on the services to be provided.” When landowners assume responsibility for welfare, owners should check their horses to ensure that the terms of the agreement are met. Alternatively, owners can appoint agents who do so on their behalf. This agreement is a contract for one party (the Agistor) to assume responsibility for the conservation and welfare of another party`s livestock against payment. This information is for landowners and horse and pony owners on how to use Agistment contracts to achieve the best results and avoid frequent agistement problems and conflicts. We advise you to get legal advice when drawing up an agistment contract. The use of a written behavior agreement is recommended, as it helps horse owners and landowners by presenting their expectations and anticipating problems before they arise.

This reduces the likelihood of unsatisfactory outcomes and other legal fees. You can contact your professional association for information on standard contracts and transfer to experienced legal advisors. From the perspective of warehouse owners, agreements also help protect the ownership of your shares.

Comments are closed.

Back to top